Steve Staios defended the Brady Tkachuk trade, calling it best for the Senators' long-term future and promising to use the cap space and picks to improve.
Bruce Garrioch had the statement. Staios said it was not a decision taken lightly, but the team did what it felt was best for the club, and now possesses cap space and draft capital to actively work on the roster.
Remember the cost. Ottawa moved Tkachuk to Florida for three first-round picks plus a second-round pick. No NHL player came back.
Look at who walked out. He's 26, carried an $8.2M cap hit, and put up 59 points in 60 games at plus-4. A top-line winger in his prime.
The timing of the statement matters. It's the GM's direct answer to a brutal reaction, the one where Mark Lazerus called the no-NHL-player return a kick in the teeth.
Staios chose his words to reframe the deal.
-
What Staios does with the haul is the real test now
Zero in on one line. "Actively working to improve our roster." That's a promise, not a result, and Staios is telling fans to judge what comes next, not just the loss.
So start with the cash. Moving an $8.2M player freed real spending power, in free agency or in a trade. The question is who he spends it on.
Then the picks. Three first-rounders are ammunition, either to draft or to package for a ready-now player. Futures only help if Staios actually converts them.
Here's the wrinkle in the framing. Ottawa sits 9th overall under Travis Green, a group with a window open right now. Leaning on "long-term future" for a team that's already good is the part that'll get second-guessed.
Here's my read: the statement says all the right things, and GMs always do after moving a star. The truth is Staios just handed himself a to-do list. The cap room and the picks mean nothing if the follow-up additions don't land.
So the trade is the easy part to grade. The hard part starts now.
Ottawa's fans want to see "actively working" turn into actual players. Until it does, this is a promise and nothing more.
Do you trust Staios to turn the Tkachuk haul into a better roster?
Also read on Markerzone.com:
A growing NHL problem is reportedly hitting Canadian teams the hardest
