The Vancouver Canucks are catching shots from their own fans again. This time the roster isn't the target. Ownership is.

A pointed post from fan account Taj summed up the frustration. A rebuild, the argument goes, is for the on-ice product, not the entire organization.

The kicker landed hard. You don't need all cheap rookies in management.

That's a direct shot at how Vancouver has built its front office, not just its lineup. And after this season, the anger is easy to understand.

Because the on-ice product gave fans nothing to soften the mood.

The Canucks finished 25-49-8 for 58 points, dead last at 32nd overall. When you bottom out that hard, every decision upstairs gets questioned.

The Hermiston hire is the move fans keep pointing at

The home record alone tells the story. Vancouver went 9-27-5 at Rogers Arena and surrendered 316 goals on the year. That's a brutal way to spend a winter.

So when management makes unconventional moves, the patience runs thin. Fans want to see seasoned, proven people steering a sinking ship, not experiments.

The move they keep circling is the Daren Hermiston hire. The Canucks brought in the agent as Director of Player Personnel and Player Development, a cheaper, outside-the-box bet on fresh thinking.

There's a real case for it. Agents understand how young players grow, the deal costs little, and Vancouver's pipeline is the whole ballgame now with seven players aged 23 or younger.

But there's a fine line, and that's the fan's actual fear. Innovative and thrifty is one thing. Cheap and rudderless is another. From the outside, they can look identical.

Here's my read: the worry is legitimate. A team that lost 49 games and scored just 216 goals hasn't earned the benefit of the doubt on anything, including who it puts in charge.

It's like a struggling restaurant hiring its whole kitchen on bargain rates. Maybe you found hidden talent. Maybe you just got cheap. The diners can't tell until the food comes out.

Ownership now has to prove this is strategy, not penny-pinching dressed up as vision. The young core they're banking on deserves real development muscle behind it.

If the kids take a step next season, nobody remembers this criticism. If they stall, the questions about ownership only get louder.

POLL
2 HOURS AGO   |   90 ANSWERS
Vancouver Canucks taking major heat after their latest moves sparked huge controversy

Is Canucks ownership being smart or just cheap with its management hires?

Also read on Markerzone.com:
Nightmare for Vegas Golden Knights as key player is rushed to the hospital